The loss of “information” and “experience” in the updated version is, in fact, regrettable. Some years ago, in 2018, the Wikipedia article included “information” and “description” besides “facts and skills”, understanding knowledge “acquired through experience or education by perceiving, discovering, or learning”. Obviously, even contemporary definitions of knowledge are on the move. By most accounts, knowledge can be acquired in many different ways and from many sources, including but not limited to perception, reason, memory, testimony, scientific inquiry, education and practice”. It might help as a first step to consult the most popular encyclopedia of today: “Knowledge is a familiarity, awareness, or understanding of someone or something, such as facts, skills, or objects. We can hardly find any suitable article in dictionaries usually consulted. Is it impossible to give a clear definition of what knowledge is? ![]() So that is no real help or at least it provides too little information. ![]() He tells us under the lemma scire that “a lot of words describe the meaning of ‘to know’ but there is no single work to quote” ( Multorum nomina Scirem nominare, sed opus non est ea singula describere ). There is one ideal way to get information on an unknown topic about the Middle Ages, for example knowledge: look it up in the ‘Glossarium mediae latinitatis’, first published by Charles du Cange ( 1610–1688 ) in 1678.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |